Praxeological research on teaching. The example of dialogical confessional religious instruction in Vienna

Praxeological research on teaching. The example of dialogical confessional religious instruction in Vienna

Authors

  • Stefan Becks KPH Wien/Krems
  • Christine Rajič KPH Wien/Krems
  • Thomas Krobath KPH Wien/Krems
  • Sonja Danner KPH Wien/Krems
  • Mónika Solymár KPH Wien/Krems
  • Gabriele Hösch-Schagar KPH Wien/Krems
  • Irina Dura-Nitu KPH Wien/Krems

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.25364/10.30:2022.1.13

Keywords:

dialogical confessional religious instruction, classroom observation, praxeology

Abstract

In this paper, we present and discuss selective results of our accompanying study on the dialogical confessional religious instruction project in Vienna. This specific mode of religious instruction in schools is characterised by an inter-confessional focus that aims at enabling students to both deepen their appreciation of their own religious denomination as well as learn to enter into a dialogue about different confessions with others. This form of instruction is therefore implemented in learner groups consisting of members of various Christian denominations. The study presented here addresses the so-called delegation model, in which a confessionally diverse group of students is taught by a single teacher. Our results show that instruction in this specific setting does predominantly fail to follow the form outlined in the program. Rather, we could observe multiple reductions of complexity that are in some cases contrary to the program’s intended goals.

Author Biographies

Stefan Becks, KPH Wien/Krems

Mag. Stefan Becks, vormals Hochschulassistent an der KPH Wien/Krems, externer Lehrender am Institut für Bildungswissenschaft der Universität Wien.

 

Mag. Stefan Becks

Universität Wien

Institut für Bildungswissenschaft

Sensengasse 3a

A-1090 Wien

e-mail: stefan.becks(at)kphvie.ac.at

Christine Rajič, KPH Wien/Krems

Mag.a Christine Rajic lehrt und forscht an der KPH Wien/Krems zu bibeldidaktischen Themenstellungen und zum konfessionell-kooperativen Religionsunterricht.

 

Mag.a Christine Rajic

KPH Wien/Krems

Mayerweckstraße 1

A-1210 Wien

e-mail: christine.rajic(at)kphvie.ac.at

Thomas Krobath, KPH Wien/Krems

Dr. Thomas Krobath, Vizerektor der KPH Wien/Krems.

 

Dr. Thomas Krobath

KPH Wien/Krems

Mayerweckstraße 1

A-1210 Wien

e-mail: thomas.krobath(at)kphvie.ac.at

Sonja Danner, KPH Wien/Krems

Prof.in Mag.a Dr.in Sonja Danner, Bereichskoordinatorin für Fortbildung evang. Religionslehrer*innen an der KPH Wien/Krems, Lehrende an der KPH Wien/Krems, im Verbund an der Universität Wien und an der PHDL Linz

 

Prof.in Mag.a Dr.in Sonja Danner

KPH Wien/Krems

Campus Gersthof

Severin Schreiber-Gasse 1+3

A-1180 Wien

e-mail: sonja.danner(at)kphvie.ac.at

Mónika Solymár, KPH Wien/Krems

Dr.in Mónika Solymár, Professorin an der KPH Wien/Krems und Privatdozentin an der Universität Wien.

 

Dr.in Mónika Solymár

KPH Wien/Krems

Mayerweckstraße 1

A-1210 Wien

e-mail: monika.solymar(at)kphvie.ac.at

Gabriele Hösch-Schagar, KPH Wien/Krems

Prof.in Mag.a Dr.in Gabriele Hösch-Schagar, BEd, Hochschullehrende in der Ausbildung für Primarstufenlehrer*innen.

 

Prof.in Mag.a Dr.in Gabriele Hösch-Schagar, BEd

KPH Wien/Krems

Institut Ausbildung Wien

Mayerweckstraße 1

A-1210 Wien

e-mail: gabriele.hoesch-schagar(at)kphvie.ac.at

Irina Dura-Nitu, KPH Wien/Krems

Mag.a Dr.in Irina N. Dura-Niţu, BEd, LL.M., Professorin am Institut Christliche Religion der KPH Wien/Krems, Koordinatorin für orthodoxe Fortbildungen im APS Bereich, orthodoxe Religionspädagogin und Mentorin in den Pädagogisch-Praktischen-Studien (Schwerpunkt orthodoxe Religion), Kultur- und Sozialanthropologin.

 

Mag.a Dr.in Irina N. Dura-Niţu, BEd, LL.M.

KPH Wien/Krems

Stephansplatz 3/3

A-1010 Wien

e-mail: irina.dura-nitu(at)kphvie.ac.at

Downloads

Published

2022-01-24

How to Cite

Becks, S. (2022) “Praxeological research on teaching. The example of dialogical confessional religious instruction in Vienna”, Austrian Journal of Religious Education, 30(1), pp. 218–238. doi: 10.25364/10.30:2022.1.13.
Loading...